26 March 2015

Black mob violence.

They didn’t count on the Old White Dude with a bat.
"The Old Man and the Sea of Black Mob Violence." By Colin Flaherty, American Thinker, 3/26/15.

H/t: Crusader Rabbit: "Wake up, Whitey. You're at war."

Have we got a surprise for you.

Progressives (liberals, leftists, socialists, communists) all disdain the West's achievement of institutionalizing respect for basic rights, limited government and the rule of law. That achievement is now under determined attack by Progressives (i.e., Western elites) but they have no concept of the ghastly consequences of abandoning that achievement:
A former senior propagandist, Jang Jin-Sun, defected to South Korea and told the documentary’s producers, “In North Korea they promote the leader to be the sun. If you go too close you burn, if you go too far you freeze to death.”[1]
Demanded his rights and
voted "NO" on the execution deal.
Progressives always assume they will end up at that perfect orbit around the leader or oligarchs of the massively statist regimes they struggle so hard to create in their own countries. They think they will be warm and comfy once their freedom-loving, traditionalist enemies have been vanquished.

Blacks similarly think that a leftist victory will mean their emancipation from the hated white man but never stop to consider what radical leftist white men will do to them when they no longer have any need for their votes.

Notes
[1] "The Dangers Of Exposing North Korea’s Secrets. A documentary's chilling tale -- in front of the camera, and behind it." By Bethany Mandel, The Federalist, 1/17/15.

H/t: what-when-how for image.

One nation. Two cultures.

"Woman Convicted of Firing Gun into McDonalds Drive-Thru Over Missing Bacon." Sputnik News, 3/26/15.

25 March 2015

What our journalists tell us on immigration.

This quote pertains to how Swedish journalists treat the subject of immigration:
We are supposed to be manipulated to think that it is completely natural that thousands of citizens from another EU-country [Gypsies] occupy streets in every Swedish city and build shantytowns in parks – and that it is our obligation to care for them.

This sort of journalism has a pronounced political agenda: to displace the foreigner [immigration] law and let the [reporters'] personal feelings control the immigration policy. The whole picture, that is, what it is that exactly happens to a country and a people who in an unprecedented fashion are invaded by people from foreign countries and cultures, is deemed irrelevant. Well, at least if that country is Sweden. What the Swedish people think is something you’ll never read about.[1]

Ms. Caesar, the author of the article below, doesn't focus on journalism, however. Rather, she focuses on Swedish feminism whose diseased state cannot be denied.

Do read what she says on that. I merely want to focus on her insightful paragraphs on the madness of the Swedish obsession with destroying Sweden through immigration.

What Caesar writes is applicable to all Western countries, although I grant that it's not clear which phenomenon -- feminism or mass immigration -- is more evil and destructive. Mass third-world immigration is presented to our people, as she notes, as something that's completely natural. It's just beyond ordinary to surrender to foreigners and hand over our country to them so they can (my words) lead us around by the nose using our own laws against us, turn our cities into no-go areas, import their barbaric practices, rape our women, attack and kill us, send billions in remittances back to their true homelands, and demand that we subsidize their parasitic lives and hostility to our culture and laws.

Notes
[1] "Congratulations Pussy Porters!" By Julia Caesar, Snaphanen, 3/7/15, translated and republished at "Congratulations Pussy Porters!" By swedishsurveyor, Swedish Surveyor, 3/23/15 (emphasis added). The mystifying term in the title is explained by swedishsurveyor in the preface to this article.

H/t: College Candy for first image.

20 March 2015

Talking trash.

No one wants to be a member of a party of traitors or of a government of traitors. Clinton and Obama didn’t accidentally stumble into their policies. They were guided by a deep rotten belief that the United States was always wrong and that the enemy, no matter how evil, had a legitimate grievance.

They can’t admit to this treasonous idea, even though they repeat it constantly in various forms, so their only defense is to claim that their treason is patriotism and that anyone who disagrees is a traitor.

"Obama's Treason is the New Patriotism." By Daniel Greenfield, Sultan Knish, 3/16/15.

A statement of the obvious.

As I have stated previously, anyone with half a brain should be able to see that we are living in the greatest debt bubble in human history. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that the “too big to fail” banks are being extraordinarily reckless (derivatives, etc.). Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that our formerly great manufacturing cities are being transformed into crime-infested hellholes. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that the middle class is dying. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that the exact same patterns that led up to the great financial crisis of 2008 are happening again. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that we simply cannot consume far more wealth than we produce as a nation indefinitely. Anyone with half a brain should be able to see that the incredibly foolish decisions that our politicians have been making for decades have placed us on a road to utter disaster.
"There Is Hope In Understanding That A Great Economic Collapse Is Coming." By Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse, 12/14/14.

Colin Powell – backstabber.

Powell’s accusation [that there is a “dark vein of intolerance in some parts of the Republican Party on race”] is ridiculous on its face. Part of the Republican Party’s problem today is that the party’s leadership, if that’s the right word, is even quicker to grovel on matters of race than Democrats are, almost always at the expense of the Americans who might actually consider voting for them. The quickest way to reduce a typical Republican pol to a quivering jelly is to whisper “racist” in his ear.

Powell’s ongoing ingratitude illustrates another aspect of the pointlessness of Republican “outreach” to most minorities. Not only does the pandering alienate possible supporters, but the pandered-to, even when as lavishly preferred and honored as Powell has been, are almost never grateful. In Powell’s case, the pandered-to diversity paladin is not only ungrateful, he’s a back-stabber to boot.

"Calling Out Colin Powell." By Henry McCulloch, The Thinking Housewife, 3/19/15.

The cowardly soul of American leaders.

Diana West, one the most perceptive thinkers of our time, published a piece[1] yesterday that merits attention.

She argues that beneath the layers of (1) poisonous Obama initiatives such as third-world replacement of the American majority (and black minority), appeasement of Iran, and pursuit of transnational elite rule and (2) terrifying Supreme Court decisions, there are even more ominous "root crises":

  • congressional abdication of its responsibility to remove a president who is contemptuous of constitutional checks and balances;
  • the failure of American political leaders to address the insult that Obama's forged birth certificate is;
  • Obama's reaching for yet more power through the United Nations, the purpose of which is suspect having been fostered and presided over by traitorous State Department official, Alger Hiss.
The failure to address these subterranean issues shows, as West says, "the cowardly soul – the most serious root crisis there is" in American leaders.

No better example of that cowardice is the fact that the Congress did not immediately impeach and convict Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg when she publicly advised the Egyptian government not to follow the U.S. Constitution as a model for drafting a constitution. A Supreme Court justice with no reverence for the constitution of her own country was left in place. She emphasizes "basic human rights" over liberty – without which all other "rights" are but temporary indulgences on the part of the ruling class. This woman has no business offering her opinion on the spirit and letter of our Constitution.

So there you have in place today two of the highest officials in the United States, for whom the Constitution is meaningless, still in office, still respected officials, and still able to do damage untouched by a spineless Congress. The perfect example of our most serious root crisis -- a Constitution that is no big deal.

Notes
[1] "Crises and 'Root Crises.'." By Diana West, 3/19/15.

19 March 2015

The un-religion.

Until we stop allowing people to define “religion” as only those beliefs related to a god or gods, people are going to continue to fail to question the rationality of their beliefs. They will continue to fall for the semantic argument and false dichotomy that as long as some belief isn’t related to a god or gods then it isn’t “religious” and therefore must be “scientific” and rational.

Unfortunately it seems that almost nobody is learning that they can have unscientific and irrational beliefs that are unrelated to gods or supernatural explanations.[1]

Some may remember that 7-Up at one point was marketed as "the un-cola." Well, then, think of the belief in the perfectibility of man, the amenability of society to the manipulations of Wise Latinas and Moisturized Men, the absolute identity of all races and cultures, the ability of minute amounts of human-generated CO2 to melt carbon steel, and the distilled evil of free markets as a central tenet of the un-religion.

According to the un-religion, only in the lofty precincts of Georgetown society, the MSM, and academe do rationality, decency, fidelity to facts, compassion, and learning reign unhindered by superstition, hypocrisy, greed, lust, envy, ancient class oppression, fanaticism, rank ignorance, the unseemly lust for political power, and hick laws.

The un-religion is not to be confused with Methodism, Calvinism, Judaism, Christian Science, Trinitarianism, Rastifarianism, the worship of Baal, Mormonism, Islam, Catholicism, Scientology, witch doctorism, or voodoo. That is some serious idiocy.

No, wait. Can we get back to you on Islam, witch doctorism, and voodoo? Our debt to Islamic scholars is enormous and you just have to appreciate people who keep it simple, real, and authentic. Apart from that, that is some serious idiocy.

Notes
[1] Comment by Nimrod on "The Alternative Reality of Sweden." By Baron Bodissey, Gates of Vienna 3/18/15.

18 March 2015

Illegal immigration and its discontents.

The recent focus on American citizens who refuse the vaccines for their children, however, have overlooked the more significant threat, which is individuals coming to our country unvaccinated. . . .

* * * *

. . . Unvaccinated populations can include citizens of our country who can’t, or choose not to, be vaccinated. Those “anti-vaccine” individuals actually make up a very small part of this. The problem is the non-citizens who are not vaccinated who visit or come and stay here illegally. The number of these individuals is so very much greater than citizens who choose not to vaccinate, yet I see this mostly ignored in discussions about forcing all citizens in this country to be vaccinated.

* * * *

While presently there is a raging anger at those citizens who choose not to vaccinate, there is nothing said about foreign visitors who come to this country, and the conversation is even shunned because of the current political correctness that is choking society.[1]

Apparently measles is more of a serious disease than I had thought. Now what about resistant TB? Is that something that can be laid at the doorstep of uncontrolled, unlimited immigration from the third world?

Disease AND crime and job theft and welfare parasitism and subversion of white culture are all aspects of the problem of illegal immigration. But it will be a cold day in hell before you'll hear about it from the left. Nope. It's rosy-cheeked infants and lovable dreamers and strivers we hear about. An omission is as much a lie as an outright misrepresentation.

Westerners can never complain about illegal immigration. We can only focus on disembodied, abstract problems that have no causation other than spontaneous appearance. A proliferation of ultra-violent MS-13 gangs in the U.S. has no connection whatsoever to illegals from El Salvador. They're just there in our backyards. Like dandelions. What can we do?

Notes
[1] "A Pediatrician’s Guide To The Vaccination Debate. What foreign visitors bring in carries greater risks to everyone than the few citizens who misguidedly refuse vaccinations for themselves or their kids." By Ron Smith, The Federalist, 2/11/15.