The exclusive emphasis of late on border security in the immigration debate has helped open-border advocates immensely. Everyone (and his dog) currently concurs that we have no problem with legal immigration, only with the illegal variety. It's now mandatory to pair an objection to the invasion of the American Southwest with an embrace of all forms of legal immigration."Immigration Occlusion." By Ilana Mercer, 5/9/05 (emphasis added).
. . . “[I]n 1965, with no real debate or voter participation, the U.S. Congress replaced the national-origin immigration criterion . . . , which effectively resulted in an emphasis on mass importation of people from the Third World. The new influx was no longer expected to acculturate to liberal democratic Judeo-Christian traditions. . . . .”
. . . Americans will never assert their right to determine the nature of the country they live in and, by extension, the kind of immigrants they welcome. The security risk newcomers pose is the only legitimate conversation. . . .
September 5, 2005
Cultural suicide in the Republic of Laputa.
An excellent post by Ilana Mercer demonstrating the tragic and undebated commitment to Third World cultural dilution of the United States:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment