Arnold Beichman writes about a Muslim's web site that describes in detail how to find a "Crusader" [i.e., "Christian"], kill him, and escape.
This Muslim, Amer Al-Najdi, is another one of those "misunderstanders" that Robert Spencer writes about. What Mr. Al-Najdi does not understand is that the Koran counsels peace and killing infidels is supposed to be something a good Mohammedan does only in the course of defending Islam from attack.
But, wait, Mr. Spencer! Whoa! Don't you see Mr. Al-Najdi's logic? A foreigner's working for a local company and his presence in Mr. Al-Najdi's homeland are attacks on Islam. One's existence as a Crusader by itself is an attack on Islam if you really think it through.
YOU, Mr. Spencer, are the one who doesn't understand Islam!
It is entirely possible for Islam to be a Religion of Peace and and for a Mohammedan to kill a Crusader mother of two who is bent on destroying Islam.
How cool is that?
Allahu akbar, sucker!
"Chilling killing guide." By Arnold Beichman, Washington Times, 8/31/06.
2 comments:
Sooo...it is OK for them to publish directions on how to KILL us, but we should not publish CARTOONS about them!
That would appear to be the logic of it. As usual, it's as much as your life is worth to try to figure out who is accountable on their end of things.
In this case, it's just some guy being horribly complicit in the death of anyone killed by some fruitcake who decided to take his instructions to heart.
There's no mention of an imamical blessing on this enterprise of completely random killing and there's absolutely no determination of any kind of "guilt" for anything. A mere trifling issue. It's enough to be a Muslim and the victim to be a "Crusader" and any bicycle repairman can act as judge, kangaroo jury, and executioner for a foreign accountant, welder, or pipeline engineer, or any member of his family.
Let's not bother to wait for any "official" condemnation of this jackass. So far as I can tell, when it's convenient for Muslims to have an official position, we'll get one; when not, it will be, "Who me?"
Post a Comment