 |
Don Imus, apparently a radio jock of some sort, refers to a black women’s basketball team as “nappy-headed hos.” Rude, certainly, and unnecessary, but nothing more. It becomes national news and he loses his job. [Nine b]lacks [in Baltimore] beat a white woman until her bones break [and she suffers deep lacerations and her eye muscles are damaged] and…near silence.[1]This is but one manifestation of the true underlying feelings of blacks. "Rev." Wright is another. Obama's studied passivity is another. Michelle Obama is yet another. Farrakhan's ravings are another. The Zebra killings are another. The statistics of black-on-white crime the most telling of all.
One way or another, each of these and countless other events are a manifestation of a widespread, black antipathy toward or hatred of whites. This is so notwithstanding whites' bending over backward for decades to accommodate black sensibilities, advance many beyond the objective measure of their achievements, and pander to their fantasies.
I wonder how long things can go on as they are. Nothing gets better. The murderous stewing hatred remains and given a chance will beat more women senseless or, sooner or later, burn another city.[2]Obama's chances of being elected president, if he's the nominee, are zero. Blacks are doubtless convinced that they are entitled to have a black (however accurate that term is with reference to Obama) president this time around. What, exactly, will be the reaction of the black underclass in November when that monumentally unrealistic fantasy (with this particular candidate, anyway) meets up with electoral realities? What realities? The ones that flowered after whites got a full and complete picture of the utter moral disgrace Obama is to have sat stupidly in the pews of Trinity United Church of Christ, "clueless" about the vitriol that was ankle deep in the pews.
At a minimum we will witness a new wave of black resentment building from the debacle, to them, of November 4. The worst? Maybe exactly the worst that Fred contemplates.
Notes
[1] "Learning from Diversity. The Case for Expatriation." Fred Reed, Fred on Everything, 12/8/07.
[2] Id.
2 comments:
I fear you're correct -- and will be branded a racist for having dared to say so. It's happened often enough to me.
The blessing of the "Rev." Wright revelations is that the black double standard is now visible for all to see. Blacks resort to duplicity to avoid the justifiable charge of racism by protesting endlessly that you can't be a racist if you have no power. Which is nonsense, or course. They know they're talking about "oppression" but they substitute "racism."
The charge of racism is hurled about for all manner of things. E.g., not liking members of another race, saying something accurate about another race, or not liking, people of the same race but different nationality. Possibly rooting for a particular sports team is racism. I'll get back to you on that.
Any time some white person doesn't like someone it "racism." If a black person voices antipathy to some other soul, it's "honesty."
It's a meaningless term. The charge means nothing. But I'm sure someone will want to accuse me of it, just as they have you.
Post a Comment