It is pathetic enough that the Brits are pursuing the Muslim's vile speech as a Speakrime -- itself evidence of a cowardly and illiberal West -- and if the Mahmudistanis had raised a fuss about that, well, what sane Westerner wouldn’t have cheered them on?
But, no such luck, as these pustules, resplendent in their fidelity to Muslim backwardness, refused to stand for the judge because it would be “a 'grave and cardinal sin' to show anyone other than Allah respect by standing.”
Give Her Honor points for being angry about it but the end result was the judge having her lips surgically attached to Muslim ass when she allowed a “compromise” that involved the dramatis personae exiting the court room and the Muslims’ reentering after the judge did. They didn’t stand up out of respect for British justice. Nothing like that. No, they just happened to be upright when they arrived back in court. Problem solved. No long-term compromise of basic principles there. None.
As KG correctly points out, if you or I were to refuse to stand, we would be charged with contempt faster than an imam can sprint from his seat on a 747 to check on his golf clubs outside the cockpit door. The craven British government grovels, however, when some repulsive third world toads defy the very apotheosis of the British justice system and its bedrock principles on grounds artfully dredged up from their dreary, dreadful, desert doctrines.
Oyez, oyez, oyez! All rise except -- per Instruments of Surrender -- Muslim bumwipes."The cowardice of Western ‘elites.’" By KG, Crusader Rabbit, 1/5/10.
No comments:
Post a Comment