Bill Clinton -- Muslim tool.

The duplicitous left makes much of the supposed WMD pretext for George W. Bush’s invasion of Iraq. But it was and is silent about Clinton’s calculated and contrived intervention in Bosnia in 1995.

The Muslim police commander of Srebrenica says the late President of Bosnia, Alija Izetbegovic, in his presence, “quoted Bill Clinton as saying that 5,000 dead Muslims would be sufficient to provide the political basis for an American-led intervention on the side of the Muslims, which both of them wanted.”^[1]

What followed was a phony drama where Muslims were free to depart from Srebrenica, which they contrived to deliver to the Bosnian Serbs for theatrical purposes from the outset.

An Amsterdam academic reported that the U.S. in roughly the period 1992-96, actively transported arms, Iranian-trained mujahidin, and al Qaida combatants, among which were two of the hijackers in the later 9/11 attack, as well as the man who helped plan 9/11, Khaled Sheik Mohammed. No doubt the latter three, in deciding to kill 3,000+ innocent American civilians in New York, had to overcome their powerful feelings of gratitude to the U.S. for its assistance in Bosnia, which included the Defense Intelligence Agency’s arranging for gaps in AWAC coverage to facilitate the delivery of the arms and mujahidin in U.S. military aircraft.

I kid you not. Talk about Bill being a cabana boy for the Muslims! Now Clinton’s wife is Secretary of State and works for Barack O’Leary Obama. I shudder to think what these two think “protecting vital U.S. interests” means.

As Mr. Trifkovic writes elsewhere,

Islam is a collective psychosis seeking to become global, and any attempt to abet such madness is to become part of the madness oneself.^[2]

Which is exactly what Mr. Clinton did . . . and President Obama is doing now. They abandoned their own people and became part of that madness.

On the issue of the alleged Srebrenica “genocide” itself Srdja Trifkovic says the 8,000 Muslim murders number is not an estimate but a “political construct” and the number of victims just doesn’t add up, though the Serbs did commit war crimes. Mass graves there contained war dead from both sides, as was true everywhere.

However, a French general had this to say about Muslim conduct before the Bosnian Serbs took over Srebrenica:

French General Philippe Morillon, the UNPROFOR commander who first called international attention to the [Muslim] Srebrenica enclave, is adamant that the crimes committed by those Muslim soldiers made the Serbs’ desire for revenge inevitable. He testified at The Hague Tribunal on February 12, 2004, that the Muslim commander in Srebrenica, Naser Oric, “engaged in attacks during Orthodox holidays and destroyed villages, massacring all the inhabitants. This created a degree of hatred that was quite extraordinary in the region.”

Asked by the ICTY [Yugoslav War Crimes Tribunal at The Hague] prosecutor how Oric treated his Serb prisoners, General Morillon, who knew him well, replied that “Naser Oric was a warlord who reigned by terror in his area and over the population itself”: “According to my recollection, he didn’t even look for an excuse. It was simply a statement: One can’t be bothered with prisoners.”

Another U.N. official stated that the Croatian army engaged in the mass murder of all Serbs in Krajina in the summer of 1995.

Clearly a more complicated situation than “Bosnian Serbs commit genocide in Srebrenica.” Yet, it was in this very tangled mess that Clinton recklessly involved the U.S. -- on the side of the Muslims.

Fellow citizens! Do we grasp the reality of how far our political leaders and system have been compromised by Saudi money?

Notes
^[1] "The Genocide Myth. The Uses and Abuses of ‘Srebrenica’." By Srdja Trifkovic, Alternative Right, 7/8/10 (emphasis added). All other material in this post are from this article but for what is taken from the article cited in the footnote below.
^[2] "The Meaning of the Myth. Srbrenica, Islam, and Western Decadence." By Srdja Trifkovic, Alternative Right, 7/14/10.