The lessons learned from the Third Reich must, therefore, be formulated as follows:No more tolerance of intolerance!The rise of Hitler during the Weimar republic is not unique, and shows how intolerance finally and inevitably emerges as victor when it is met with blind, radical tolerance [such as the “Weimar Republic proclaimed tolerance for any form of ideology”]. This thesis has proved itself to be as true as a natural law of physics. Historian Karl Dietrich Bracher describes the result of scientific examinations of the subject and why Hitler managed to rise to power:"Paralysis and decay (disintegration) of a free state system were at last consequences of confused parameters, weakened readiness of defence and illusions of tolerance towards enemies of democracy."This analysis is not only true of the Weimar republic. It describes exactly the current situation of the failure of Europe in the face of a totalitarian theocracy coming in religious disguise which is busy gaining control over Europe.
The political imperative of the slogan "No more war" leads to weakness and even powerlessness if challenged by an enemy who — for the past 1,400 years — has been ready to wage war and utilize other forms of violence in order to achieve its goals.[1]
 |
Muslims know full well what is happening in Europe, even if the Europeans are clueless:
It is our goal to settle on the European continent, living there quietly in accordance with the law so that in future the whole of Europe may be Islamic.[2]~ Former Turkish Prime Minister Necmettin Erbakan.
To the same effect:
‘There are approximately 2.5 Million Muslims living in Germany today. By the mercy of Allah we live in one of the world’s richest countries…The future of Islam in this country, Germany, is forged by us; we who have been born and raised here; we who speak the German language and know the mentality of this people…~ Ibrahim El-Zayat, former General Secretary of the Muslim Council, former Federal Chairman of the Muslim Student Association Germany. This is one @#$% who desperately needs [to be educated].
I do believe that the chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany elected in 2020 might well be a Muslim born in Germany, and that the constitutional judge be a Muslim…This country is ours and it is our duty to positively change it. With the help of Allah we shall turn it into our paradise on earth in order to make it available to the Islamic Umma and humanity at large.’[3]
Americans have nothing to feel smug about as our failings are qualitatively similar even if the number of Muslims here is relatively small. The surviving vitality of the First Amendment here still offers some protection to American dissenters from multiculturalism. The opposition to the Ground Zero Mosque surely would not have been possible in any European country. Still, the survival of “hate speech” laws and various Obama Administration plans to control speech are a warning that the political class is not peopled by First Amendment purists. And semantic contortions in the form of terms like “man-caused disasters” bespeak a boot-licking obsequiousness on the part of senior officials.
 |
The only part I take issue with is Mannheimer’s idea that Islam can only be overcome by winning the hearts and minds and approaching them with the right mindset. That’s a strategy just as dangerous and futile as hoping Muslims will be nice to you when they are on top as you are to them when they are not.
No. The way to deal with Muslims and their “theocratic imperialism” is to remove them from the West and leave them to sort out how much rationality and decency they want to incorporate into their poisonous culture. No accommodation is possible with Muslims whom you have allowed to gain access to your own homeland. None.
Notes
[1] "Islam as the Victor of Western Value-Relativism." By Michael Mannheimer, Gates of Vienna, 11/21/10. Footnote omitted.
[2] Id.
[3] Id. Emphasis added, footnote omitted.
No comments:
Post a Comment