And the question remains, why would Obama agree to a forged birth certificate? He knew the media would protect him, but why do it unless there is something to the story that he was in fact not born in Hawaii?[1]It's a given that Obama's White House web site "birth certificate" (Certificate of Live Birth) is a forgery. Thus, the next question is why Mr. Obama thought it necessary to provide it.
Oddly, the forgery itself is conclusive proof of Obama's constitutional ineligibility for the office of president, the man named as his father being a non-citizen and all. Right out there in front of man and God.
In a nation not besotted by bullshit that alone should have guaranteed Obama a career as an ineffectual U.S. senator drifting forever in a Sargasso Sea of "presentness." But . . . somehow this inconvenient parentage is a guaranteed skate in our Constitution-optional nation.
So, given the gold-plate guarantee of a MSM free pass on that issue (natural born citizen), what then would be the BFD about having a birth certificate from Hawaii?
Since the gravamen of Obama's claim to eligibility is not his being a natural born citizen but his being a citizen by birth on American soil, it must be that a forged "birth certificate" showing birth on U.S. soil overcomes the problem of being born on foreign soil, possibly a distinctly alien place filled with putative relatives in polygamous marriages or living in houses with chickens (free-range) underfoot, and having to take additional awkward later steps to elect U.S. citizenship.
Even the round-heeled U.S. MSM must have been assumed to be unwilling to sell out the Constitution when faced with such a oh-so-foreign aroma to Obama's candidacy.
Either that or Obama's actual father was someone whose identify, if known to the electorate, would guarantee electoral failure.
At any rate, such are the measures needed to ring fence the truth about Barack Hussein Obama, who has fewer papers than a pedigree cocker spaniel.
A lot of other people were necessary to carry off this deception and non-reportage (including most conservatives). Who they are and why they have acted as they did are fascinating questions. On the issue of why, I vote for the need to pander to blacks. As we always do. Black? Ipso facto legit. White? Ipso facto not so much.
Go Sheriff Joe.
Notes
[1] "The Criminal Investigation." By Judson Phillips, Tea Party Nation, 3/2/12.
2 comments:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojMqFoV_byE
Is Malcolm X his daddy?
Thank you.
The U/I speaker makes some good points but the Nation of Islam atmospherics are hard to take.
Post a Comment