23 January 2017

Disconnect.

My lady friend observed that last Saturday's women's marches around the country had a distinct component of idiocy but she thought that still some of the women had a point about "objectification" and not wanting to be treated as sex objects.

She nonetheless found it ironic that the demonstrations took place with the strong backing of Hollywood, no town on earth ever having done more to objectify women and treat them as sex objects.

6 comments:

bluebird of bitterness said...

Yep... the contradiction is lost on the left.

Col. B. Bunny said...

I love their "Trump denigrates women" idea which they then articulate while wearing pink simulations of their private parts around their faces. We're in "mother of my children" territory right there.

The Femen types are particularly stupid. They bare their boobs for all the world to see, act like screaming harridans (actually, they ARE screaming harridans), and then do a melt down because men treat them as sex objects. Maybe the idea is that bare boogs SHOULD be no more titillating than a big toe but it's been rumored that men seem, as an integral part of their being, to find boobs more fascinating than nuclear weapons, radar-controlled machine guns, motorcycles, rifles, tanks, and fuel-injected cars.

This too is impermissible as men must rise above their base natures to see these nymphs (and walruses) as distilled loveliness.

Col. B. Bunny said...

. . . boobs, not boogs.

wwmike said...

Boos is probably more accurate

wwmike said...

Boos is probably more accurate

Col. B. Bunny said...

Sometimes reality is harsh. One of the reasons that some women turn to feminism and batting for the other team, I think.