Serotonin, as by now every self-obsessed member of the middle classes must know, is a chemical in the brain that acts as a neurotransmitter to which is ascribed powers formerly ascribed to the Holy Ghost. All forms of undesired conduct or feeling are caused a deficit or surplus or malalignment of this chemical, so that in essence all human problems become ones of neurochemistry.Modern psychiatry is little more than a search for the right chemical result in the body. The search for mental repose in the office of a psychiatrist is much like taking one's car to a mechanic to check the antifreeze in the engine block for the right level of protection against winter temps. Protected to -20 deg. F? Good to go, boss!On this view, unhappiness is a technical problem for the doctor to solve rather than a cause for reflection and perhaps even for adjustment to the way one lives.[1]
The matter of cleaning up one's act must seem quaint to a lot of "folks" as Obongo might say. More likely, the search is on for the state to supply some missing element: free food, free education, free medical care, free housing, free phones . . . .
As Mr. Dalrymple also says in his article, "Technical sophistication has been accompanied, or so it often seems, by mass incompetence in the art of living." In my experience, our culture is an isolating one and to break out of isolation one must actively take steps to find community. You must mount a quest for it rather than community's being something that enfolds you naturally. And I say this as a reasonably gregarious person.
I once had the pleasure of knowing some Sikhs when I rehabed my rental house in a densely populated area. These people lived next door and were a pure pleasure to know. They'd bring me food in the morning and at lunch and seemed to have a natural kindness. Of course, I was happy to return their kindness in small ways. It was something that happened to me with no effort on my part. Just mutual respect. And very pleasant indeed. Such cheerful people.
That just happened to me. I once got into country western dancing and had a terrific time in that community of like-minded people. It involved a refined taste, however, and didn't have an effect on daily life, though I made several nice friends out of it. But I had to pursue it and it involved considerable effort, not least being the need to drive 40 miles round trip to go to dances or take lessons. And this was nothing that had any bearing on life's daily routines.
The obvious other option for community is marriage and family. That's a heck of an option, though I think it puts pressure on the relationship because one looks to one's mate to help satisfy a lot of one's social needs. Of course, marriage and family automatically lead to a widening of one's social circle, especially through having lots and lots in common with other parents.
Maybe one's life is at bottom a one-man production. Marcus Aurelius captured what life is like to live as an aware person who lives with humans who are not particularly aware. Stoic philosophy is in this respect a bit of a downer, though it appeals to me because of what it teaches about, um, stoicism. Learning to accept what is, however unpleasant, is also an option. The "suck it up" option.
Many are the consolations of philosophy.
Dalrymple quotes Salman Rushdie to the effect that there is in modern Western life “a God-shaped hole.” Religious faith not being my cup of tea, alas, I don't have an ability or inclination to fill that particular hole. What's left is the question, How can community be made more "automatic" where you bump into it in your daily activities without having to take Zumba classes? Our drug problems seem to be a symptom of how many people are not finding satisfying connections.
Army life was fun because we all had a common enemy. That was either the actual enemy, the weather, or the army itself. Or all three. But civilian life doesn't have that kind of intensity or anything remotely resembling that dynamic. Personal initiative is always in order but there very much is a gulf between what I describe about army life (and maybe church life) and isolated living that seems to be our lot.
I don't know which new azimuth we need to strike out on in search of a global, definitive solution. The device of the scurrilous and dishonest ad hominem so beloved of the left today is clearly the wrong way to approach our fellow beings. Those who employ it have zero interest in anyone's spiritual longings (AKA their actual happiness), let alone the truth. It's all about power and that's a slippery eel as many a former Bolshevik loyalist found as they were marched into the basement of the Lubyanka. "But, but . . . ."
Small courtesies and smiles freely given do wonders for me and instill a sense of well being and okayness. Simple interaction. Simple pleasure. It isn't rocket science and everyone committing to communicate respect will do wonders, even if there's no secular "school solution" (in the argot of the U.S. Army Infantry School regarding tactical problems) to the problems of human existence.
Here endeth this partickaler ramble.
Notes
[1] "Michel Houellebecq: Chronicler of Our Mass Incompetence in the Art of Living." By Theodore Dalrymple, Law & Liberty, 2/28/19.
5 comments:
Indeed, small smiles will do wonders for most. Especially after reading much of the reporting that preceded the satire, seemingly designed to leave the reader depressed -- er -- unhappy. Satire is wasted on those who believe themselves above it. They are so wise they're stupid. And thus we must be the evil ones because we permit them to persist.
Small affirmations go a long way. A related thought is that if you feel loved, you don't need a lot of love but, if not, then you can never get enough.
Sorry to be dense but what is the satire to which you refer? :-)
I felt assured that you read the whole of Dalrymple's review, so I indulged in a little of my own takeaway. Here is where he did more than hint on the nature of the satire.
"Houellebecq satirises what might be called the neurochemical view of life which is little better than superstition or urban myth. "
Satire was the tool with which Pascal succeeded even beyond his grave. But it's long since grown useless because the postmodern targets of such are far more calloused that his enemies.
I've a more troubling reason for having lost interest in laughing at the stupid as I many like me have done for so long. That is because I've come to realize that in permitting the stupid to persist with so little obstruction from me that I've led evil to my door. And I'm even more troubled that it may be too late for the majority of those unpleasantly becoming aware to battle it effectively. Thus, no laughing matter.
While the swamp creatures may be able to drown their fears with these chemicals, we dare not.
I see said the blind man as he picked up his hammer and saw. :-)
I did read it but missed that aspect of it. "Dense" covers the waterfront here. Thanks.
Maybe stimulating laughter in others is more powerful than we realize. Ten tons of factual argument clearly does little. That Macron and Merkel were elected is proof of that. It's the most displaying aspect of the Current Crisis. But laughter slips the message between the ribs. A funny video take on Jussie Smollett has him being hand $16,000 for a weeks work whereupon he tosses it onto his dressing table and says something like, "I worked three days this week. It's not enough."
Bottom line though: Whatever works. I try to find images to make a point sometimes. Visuals are more powerful than words.
No one has the perfect approach though hats off to Paul Joseph Watson, Mark Steyn, Tucker Carlson, Ben Shapiro, Ann Coulter, and Milo, each with a unique style. I still think it's a race to the bottom, however. Good to slow the wreck if we can but I think it's too late. We're deep into "God will not be mocked" territory.
Post a Comment