September 28, 2005

Recess time.

The Colonel heads for a cool seminar sponsored by the The Federalist Society. It looks like all Col. Bunny blogging must cease for about a week. If we can manage a few desultory posts, we will post.

September 27, 2005

Agent 86, Maxwell Smart, dies.

In 1941, he dropped out of school to join the Marines. In Guadalcanal he survived the deadly blackwater fever and was returned to the States to become a drill instructor, acquiring the clipped delivery that served him well as a comedian.
From Petrified Truth.

September 26, 2005

Getting the job done.

Graphic video of Iraq combat. Not for the squeamish.

This mujahideen, insurgent, jihadi, or whatever, freely decided to take the field against US troops on behalf of one of history's more ignoble causes, which isn't saying much. The man had courage to go out in the open like that, though it shows an incredible stupidity as well.

There is a certain penalty for this, as you can see, which we frankly relish. Pantywaist sensibilities require us to wring our hands in despair, but we do not.

Anyone who doesn't like this little bit of frankness can just let me know. I'll post a picture of, say, a helpless Westerner about to be beheaded to remind you what these people are all about. It's not about analyzing or talking any more, it's about killing so many of our enemies that they do not dare to attack us. Col. Ghaddafi call your office.

This is just what the doctor ordered and the pressure on other of our enemies must be long-term, relentless and horrific. It's a brutal and archaic concept we grant you. And majestically sophisticated for its simplicity. At some point the dregs of the world need to understand that the West is through with discussion and compromise. God bless George Bush for recognizing this.

The enemy having failed in open combat now resorts to IEDs and killing children with human bombers.

Assymetric warfare.

Pray that the suitcase nukes will not make it across our borders. Keeping the assymetrics out is as much a priority as putting naval iron in the sea.

Alas, Mr. Bush's utter indifference to this is impossible to understand.

Verbum sapienti sat est.

Only good infidel is extremely dead infidel.
Not amused.
Here's a choice Ayatollah Khomeini quote in Patrick al-Kafir's article, "New Aesma Daeva":

But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world... Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all!
If what you read from Mr. al-Kafir doesn't make you want to do another ramp up a la post-Pearl Harbor, man, nothing will. Just go back to sleep, dude.

Madrassa abuse.

El hinto.
Looking for love in all the wrong places . . . .
An interesting post by Miss Mabrouk of Egypt that actually shows healthy internal ferment about entirely home-grown abuses in Islamic society.

Especially encouraging is this:

"The mullahs think they are above the law," said Asma Jehanghir, chairwoman of the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, a nongovernment agency. "We have to break this wall of silence."

September 25, 2005

Free speech and the hatred of it.

Last month, another Istanbul court opened a case against Orhan Pamuk the internationally acclaimed Turkish author. He is due to appear in court on December 16 on charges of insulting Turkey's national dignity by telling a Swiss newspaper that one million Armenians and 30,000 Kurds had been killed in Turkey and that nobody dared to say so.

Is it not crystal clear that restrictions on speech are road spikes on the Highway to Truth? (Yes, we've had too much coffee today and we are a little wired.)

Who cares whether "Turkish dignity" is insulted? The only questions to ask are, "Is what he said true?" and "Did he intend it as an immediate incitement to violence?"

If what is said is not true, free speech has served its purpose in publicizing the opinions and names of people whose opinions are worthless. If it is true, it becomes part of the "operative facts" of that country, for good or ill, with appropriate consequences to follow on. Since the killings did take place, the emphasis ought, for example, to be on what led to the killings and who were responsible for them. Energy is better expended there rather than in resorting to absurd measures of suppression, such as purporting to defend Turkish "dignity." The killings are what should be seen as what "insulted" that dignity or made Turkey look bad, not that courageous man pointing out the obvious fact of the killings.

True speech thus should lead to salutary corrective.

Egyptian University of Nablus students threw a professor out of a second-story window for arguing that Islam developed gradually rather than out of the mouth of Mohammed. Khomeini sentenced a non-Iranian Salman Rushdie to death for unflattering things he wrote about Mohammed. Malaysian women are prosecuted for preaching Christianity. Christians are stabbed in Pakistan. These actions, and millions like them, keep Islam mired in the Samsara Swamps that draw back down into the ooze anyone with an idea that might lead to the betterment of all.

And, as we have harped incessantly, they show the painful insecurity of Muslims who simply cannot bear the least bit of head-to-head competition with their fastidleinneutral religion.

And not just on the issue of Islamic amelioration. We all have a huge stake in keeping public debate raw, vigorous, robust, and exuberant. As one wise man or woman said, free speech is good because it helps identify the crazies. The Colonel's paraphrase of another wise person is that the remedy for slime speech is more slime speech. The same sentiment exactly.

And, therefore, the only valid concerns are these:

  1. Is the speech true?
  2. Is it intended as an immediate incitement to violence?

Whether someone is offended, insulted, or hurt is irrelevant and anyone who whines thus is just simply pathetic. There are a lot of people the Colonel thinks would be better off drifting in an inner tube in the Roaring Forties. Yet, unfortunately, they are still here and continue to say stuff about his country, culture and cherished beliefs that, according to the strict dictates of Divine Justice, warrant horse whipping, at a minimum.

But, bottom line, we don't care a fig about what historical illiterates say and neither should anyone with the least backbone care what is said about their cherished idols.

Weak people need to have it pointed out to them that no one cares whether they are offended, that offense taken is irrelevant in the realm of public debate, and that their real problem is their terror at being unable to refute an attack on the merits. Since Muslims are on such shaky ground, and know it, of course they have to react with blind violence to silence the competition.

"Turkish Court Blocks Conference on Armenian Genocide." Assyrian International News Agency, 9/23/05. From: Cultural Amnesia, Gates of Vienna, 9/24/05.

September 24, 2005

Fix bayonets! Find cheeky blighters!

The author of our source reports on the discovery of "extreme racist and paramilitary views" on a website "linked to" the City of Edinburgh Universities Officer Training Corps.

One example of a racist statement cited is this:

One [cadet] is said to have written that he is tired of "Abdul foreigner" coming to the university seeking changes in tradition and another suggests that overseas students should live as locals do or return to their own countries. Shocked [oh, sure] UOTC leaders and the Ministry of Defence (MoD) have now launched investigations to find out who is responsible [and gone home at lunch to get clean hankies].

Edinburgh UOTC Adjutant Major Derek Lawson has insisted that "these attitudes will not be tolerated". [Grrr rrrr woof.]

An MoD spokeswoman said anyone sharing such inflammatory views would be weeded out . . . .

So let's parse these statements that evidence racist views, and not just ordinary racist views, mind you, but extreme racist views.

"Abdul foreigner" -- This phrase is on the order of "Freddy foreigner" or "Francois foreigner" or "Fritz foreigner." Abdul, Freddy, etc., are all Christian names regularly in use, none denoting or connoting putrescence, depravity, or a treasonous nature.

Since the writer chose "Abdul" it's clear he drew a connection between "foreigner" and "Middle East" or "Arab" or, possibly, "Islam." This connection can be studied, with definitive resolution to await determination of how many foreigners in Edinburgh or Scotland are in fact in one or more of these loose categories of humans. As all of the European Union and the U.K. are awash in people from these populations or areas, it's almost certain that there are large numbers of foreigners of these kinds visible to the cadet.

That the cadet might have lumped native born people whose parents emigrated to the U.K. with foreigners with no or limited rights to reside in Scotland is certainly unobjectionable as the English have had plenty of experience with even native-born Anglo-Saxons who were panting to betray their country to savage enemies during Cold War times.

For officials to draw the line at legal residents or citizens v. visa-holding foreigners is specious. Mohammad Sidique Khan, London subway killer on his personal little jihad (". . . I am directly responsible for protecting and avenging my Muslim brothers and sisters."), was born in Leeds but felt nothing but contempt for England ("Our religion is Islam, obedience to the one true God Allah . . . ."). Thus, it would be quite accurate to refer to Mr. Khan as a foreigner.

Moreover, it's certainly the question of the day whether other resident Muslim populations in Western countries are willing to integrate themselves fully into and swear political allegiance to countries that does not intend to implement sharia.

Mention to the Colonel Chinese, Japanese, Indian, Mexican, Peruvian, Haitian, Barbadian, or Botswanan immigrants to the U.S. and he will not consider for an instant that these people are not eager to become citizens. Only the minuscule proportion of lunatics and malcontents of those groups would have the equivalent Muslim intention of standing the U.S. A. on its head and turning it from a nation that is dedicated to the rule of law based on common law and civil law precepts into one ruled by the sharia, founded as it is on embarrassment that is the Koran and its incomprehensible or disjointed gloss.

The cadets' resentment at foreigners (or anyone) coming to attend a major institution of higher learning and demanding changes to well-settled traditions is hardly reprehensible or even objectionable. Surely we have escaped the execrable gravitational pull of the 60s where any tradition, any institution, any rational requirement other than the requirement to have fun could be called into question by any featherhead with a guitar and the lyrics to "Blowin' in the Wind."


New Friday lunch item, Edinburgh University student cafeteria. Per order UKMoD.
Not pork.















Being unwilling to live as locals do may be something that the cadet criticizes unfairly though let us not precipitously conclude that "Abdul" merely wishes to wear his keffiyah to class or have his wife dress in the sartorial equivalent to a collapsed man o' war mainsail. (The Colonel hissef would positively refuse to eat haggis, whether boiled, fried, fricasseed, or soaked in chili sauce. Local custom be damned, Sah!)

It could be, as further fair, fearless, fact ferreting might disclose, that this disinclination to fit in with local mores more resembles something more disgusting like. say, the practice of Cubans in Miami devoted to the, uh, religion of Santeria, who sacrifice chickens (leaving mortal remains to rot) outside courthouses to ensure victory in legal battles or Southeast Asians who barbecue goats in bathtubs (in rented quarters).

So we trust that this escalating search for the authors of these eminently sane, fairminded, and defensible thoughts will stop short of the British Ministry of Defence's figuratively groveling at the boots of people who should be grateful to High Heaven for the privilege of walking Edinburgh streets instead of, as we strongly suspect, throwing their weight around.

If it turns out that the foreigner population of Edinburgh is primarily Ukrainian, the miscreant cadets should be forced to crawl from mosque to rifle range to bomb factory to Koran memorization session and do penance.

Unsolicited Yank advice to MoD force planners: This little exercise is a great way to ensure that your officer corps will be built upon individuals who are terrified of speaking their minds. Your cadets are now learning from you that should one wander off into the "England's culture is quite nice but hardly better than any other culture" minefield his or her career is over.

More unsolicited Yank advice to MoD force planners: The Real Problem here is that an official site was used to express personal views. Discipline the lads, say by forcing them to read 50 pages of the Koran, and leave it at that. Now you'll recruit robust thinkers and risk takers who will exercise initiative and bring (yet more) honor and fame to the British armed forces and who know they'll be horribly punished if they use MoD resources to troll for tarts or publish their personal views. While you're at it, assign Major Lawson, 100 pages in the Koran for failing to monitor his web site. No. Wait. That's too horrible.

Yet more unsolicited Yank advice to MoD force planners: Lose the witch hunt. No one needs to be weeded out . . . except maybe the officer who told the MoD spokeswoman to announce that miscreant cadets will be weeded out.

Memo to Ms. McGlynn: Now write a followup story about whether or not there is any basis for the cadets' opinions.

"Racist and paramilitary views found on students' cadet site." By Fiona McGlynn, Scotsman.com, 9/21/05.

"Offend the Colonel" Contest

The Colonel has long marveled at the inability of the Left and minorities of various hue or heritage to deal honestly with the slightest deviation from their preferred public policies, boodle air drops, or allocation or reduction of special privileges. Nor does the debasement of public discourse on any issue surprise the Colonel any more.

Running through the sewer of public discourse these days is the constant tidal wave of whiners being "dismayed" or "offended" at some particular instance of someone telling the God's own truth about race relations, the lumpenproletariat, the enemies of the United States and the pressing need to kill them, immigration, bilingualism, effective administration of elections, or constitutional law.

An intelligent person makes some perfectly sensible observation of American life backed up by credible facts and instead of addressing the merits of the observation, the debate veers off into the brambles of how some thin-skinned cretin "feels" or might "feel" about the argument rather than focusing whether the observation is true or not.

The whole thing about searching out things to be offended by is a complete hoax and a deliberate obfuscation of the necessary, and often sloppy, search for truth (of which, we are, galactically speaking, the source).

To highlight this obfuscatory intention the Colonel hereby declares that he will pay $100 to each and every person who can deliberately and with malice aforethought (which may be the only forethought some people are capable of) offend . . . the . . . Colonel.

Admittedly the Colonel will be the judge of whether anyone has succeeded in offending him but he is an honest man, even if of dubious heritage, and actual offense achieved will be honestly reported and rewarded.

For the record, the Colonel has his genetic origins in England and Bavaria and it would be accurate to describe him as a "white man." He is a citizen of the U.S.A. and thinks that the civilization that grew up in Europe and certain parts of North America (with very little contributory enrichment by the Colonel but for the occasional camel joke) is vastly superior to any culture most anywhere else in the world.

The Colonel has no particular religious affiliation but is an admirer of certain aspects of Christianity and Buddhism mixed in with an amorphous and not particularly coherent devotion to hedonism and asceticism. Nor will The Colonel pass up any opporutnity to attend religious ceremonies involving (1) naked pagan priestesses leaping over bonfires and (2) consumption of beverages whose manufacture has occasioned very little in the way of federal tax revenue.

Got that?

By way fo further helpful explication of his religious sensibilities, the Colonel helpfully points out that he thinks it is unbelievably cool to march through the streets and lash oneself with knives attached to chains. That is an indication of a very serious religion indeed and we certainly hope contestants don't stray too close to that sensitive topic. But it's only fair that we reveal our actual attitudinal and emotional weak points.

The Colonel further thinks the United States are pretty amazing, notwithstanding the destructive inroads of socialism, low-rent racial politics, feminism, betrayal of the Constitution by the Supreme Court, and a traitorous intellectual class unable to distinguish between its own home base (with defects) and sundry third world sewer systems (without much in the way of good points other than "authenticity" or flamingos).

No points are awardable and no money will be paid for any attacks on the Colonel based upon detailed knowledge of the Colonel's actual character defects or personal transgressions (numberless as the sands of the sea though they may be). The Colonel's actual personal merit, or lack thereof, is irrelevant. You must attempt to offend the Colonel by reference to his group characteristics or his being a descendant of other members of his group(s) who perpetrated some massacre, achieved intellectual and technological dominance over others, discovered Indiana, or committed other similar despicable acts.

Referring to the Colonel as "an offay, honkey descendant of slave masters" would qualify, although it would not result in payment to the submitter because we don't know what "offay" or "honkey" mean. We admit "descendant of slavemaster" stings some but we are still not offended by it.

Actually, any insult leveled at the Colonel will qualify, so long as it doesn't proceed from knowledge of the Colonel's actual sins.

The following are other examples of what would be qualifying, though losing entries. We will add to this list as contestants submit their entries:
  • Americans are imperialist dogs.
  • White people are lazy pigs.
  • White people are all Crusaders at heart.
  • Dead, white European-origin males are the scourge of humanity.
  • You and your countrymen are killers and idiots.
  • Europeans stole algebra from Arabs.
  • Americans are loud, loose, and low life.
  • You are a capitalist swine.
  • The only thing world class about western civlization is the degree to which it encourages greed and exploitation of others.
  • Your people can't dance or jump.
  • Mohammed contributed more to the advancement of mankind when he ate one breakfast than all the scientists and healers of Europe did in ten centuries of endeavor.
So, seek personal enrichment and please, please, leave comments to OFFEND THE COLONEL.

Be really, really insensitive!

Police torture, judicial murder in China.

The Chinese have a delicious description of managing to have some necessary contact with bureaucracy and withdrawing safely: Escape from the mouth of the dragon.

Here's a fascinating story about a Chignese man who escaped -- eventually -- notwithstanding determined, multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional efforts to injure him mortally:

General problem:

The police and courts still rely mainly on pretrial confessions and perfunctory court proceedings to resolve criminal cases instead of the Western tradition of analyzing forensic evidence and determining guilt through contentious court trials. China's criminal laws forbid torture and require judges to weigh evidence beyond a suspect's confession. But lawyers and legal scholars say forced confessions remain endemic . . . .
Specifics:

Mr. Kahn, the source of this story, tells of the vicious treatment of an innocent man, Qin Yanhong, in Anyang, Henan Province. China. Next time you want a textbook story of arbitrary, inquisitional government at work, come back to this story.

  • Mr. Qin was subjected to the "tiger stool."
  • Mr. Qin was subjected to "taking a jet plane."
  • Mr. Qin was subjected to "circling the pig."
  • Mr. Qin's trial was closed to the public.
  • His trial lasted less than one day, no witnesses called by prosecutor.
  • Mr. Qin was forbidden to call his own witnesses.
  • He was convicted on the basis of his "confession" alone.
  • "Oral confessions" are insufficient grounds for conviction (Criminal Procedure Law).
  • The Chinese constitution forbids use of torture to obtain confessions.
  • In China there is no legal right to have a lawyer present during interrogation.
  • This right would have absolutely protected Mr. Qin in this case.
  • In China there is no legal right to remain silent.
  • Mr. Qin was sentenced to death.
  • He spent four years in jail till released only by sheer luck.
  • He as paid only $35,000 in compensation ($4.21/hr for his trouble) but on condition he not talk to the media or ask higher authority for more money.

Incredibly, Mr. Shen Jun, the senior detective in charge of Mr. Qin's interrogation was promoted.

Who would have guessed there's such a shortage of trained cops in China that a committed, systematic torturer would have to be kept on and even

Lucky to be alive.
promoted. Someone must have sent out an APB with the word "decency" in it and caused half the cops in China to drop dead from laughing.

Mr. Qin was saved from death only by a retired soldier who went to the police and confessed to 18 murders, one of which was, clearly, the murder for which Mr. Qin had been convicted.

The police and judges who so viciously worked over Mr. Qin, far from immediately freeing him, set out to suppress the new evidence of exoneration and keep him on death row.

Authorities in the two cases involving Mr. Qin and the retired soldier agreed to prosecute the soldier for 17 murders instead of 18 and leave Mr. Qin's conviction intact.

Now that has to be some kind of a Guiness record, even in the annals of Chinese communist rule.

Consensus leader of teeny tiny minority of unelected, privileged claque.
Emphasis here is on the word "communist," which was (along with its sister form of fascism in Germany and Japanese militarism gangster psycho fascism) responsible for just about everything vile in the last century, until, that is, the hatching of Arafat, Khomeini, Hamas, Hezbollah, and other such forms of human lice.

In China's top-down political system, the police, prosecutors and judges respond mostly to incentives from above, [defense lawyer and former prosecutor] Mr. Li [Bin] said. They pay a much higher price for failing to maintain the appearance of social order than for torturing suspects, he said.

"The judicial system is set up to protect the authority of the government," he said. "It is not set up to protect the rights of suspects."
Mr. Qin had no right of appeal. Bottom line: the august legal system of the majestic Marxist-Leninist People's Republic of China boils down to being institutionalized arbitrariness in the hands of (1) predatory local cops and (2) "judges" with zero interest in the search for the truth even when it's a matter involving taking away a man's life.

It turns out that that seemingly innocuous term "the search for truth" is a vital part of the criminal justice system in any country, as well as of science, public policy, personal relations, and inner jihad. Anything that undermines that search, such as slavish devotion to the lies of multiculturalism, blocks off a part of reality from critical inquiry and the cockroaches of superstition, obscurantism, and political correctness will fill the void in the time it takes to say "religion of peace."

The last, excellent word is from Rising Sun:
I'm sorry, but you can take your cultural relativism and shove it. This is not a question of Western values versus Asian values. The actions reported in the above three stories [of which this was one] indicate that China's government, quite simply, does not value human life, dignity, or freedom at all. And no matter how many computers it networks or skyscrapers it builds, China will never truly become a modern nation until it does.
"Rule by Law. Deep Flaws, and Little Justice, in China's Court System." By Joseph Kahn, New York Times, 9/21/05.

September 21, 2005

Rick Rescorla - extraordinary.

Follow me!

If this story doesn't amaze you and move you profoundly you have a heart as hard as the Kaba itself.

"911 Remembered: Rick Rescorla was a soldier." Greyhawk, The Mudville Gazette, 9/11/05.

Money to Saudi "charity" = money to jihad.

IST commented recently on the effrontery of the Saudi government in working to distribute Korans to violent members of the U.S. underclass. There it was clear that a certain Saudi charity was responsible for distributing these Korans to this audience. The Saudis later shut down this charity when they "discovered" that it was connected to al Qaeda. Bigggg surprise in Saudi land.

Now we have the secretary-general of the Saudi government's Muslim World League Koran Memorization Commission, Sheikh Abdallah Basfar, on Saudi TV giving the hard sell on the duty of all Muslims to contribute to jihad.

All the funds sent via known charities and organizations reach your Muslim brothers, Allah be praised. Undoubtedly, this aid is obligatory and not just recommended. This is the duty of every Muslim, based on the scholars' religious ruling that supporting our brothers in Palestine is obligatory. Therefore, material support is a duty.
Thus we have the Saudi government soliciting funds to but one of many "charities" with full awareness that the funds are going to support jihad, the indiscriminate-killing version not the hug-yourself-and-keep-a-diary version. The Saudis knew damn well where the contributions to Al-Haramain were going.

"Saudi Government Official on Iqra TV: All Muslims Must Support Jihad -- Send Money to the Saudi Committee for Support of the Al-Quds Intifada, Account No. 98." MEMRI Special Dispatch Series - No. 990, 9/22/05.

September 20, 2005

Chinese assassination policy.

Quite pissed.
Short $140 mill.
Here's a choice snippet from a story about Chinese efforts to buy technology that would allow it to intercept U.S. satellite intelligence report transmissions. A Mr. Liu and a Mr. Zheng made off with $140 million intended for the purchase.

Not surprisingly, Chinese intelligence is searching for thse two men. Possible sanctions include killing the men AND their families:

China's intelligence service, the Ministry of State Security (MSS), offered a reward of $1 million for information about the location of the two Chinese men and the men's "entire families." The men were identified as Liu Zuoqing, a manager of a company in northern China, and Zheng Dequan, a son-in-law of Mr. Liu.

The [FBI] report also said China's spy agencies had told its agents in the United States to find the men and that Chinese intelligence was prepared to kill the men and their family members. [1]
"The part about killing the families is a nice touch, don't you think? It's true there are some "who won't be missed" but, darn heck, why put up with half measures?

Notes
[1] China sought system to intercept U.S. spy data." By Bill Gertz, The Washington Times, 9/12/05.

September 19, 2005

Saudi subversion -- the sheer effrontery.

Allah . . . commanded the Muslims to fight against all the Mushrikun [infidels who are not Jews or Christians] as well as against the people of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians) if they do not embrace Islam, till they pay the Jizyah (a tax levied on the non-Muslims who do not embrace Islam and are under the protection of an Islamic government) with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.

Abdullah bin Muhammad bin Humaid, Saudi Arabia's former chief justice, in a 22-page Appendix to a Wahhabi version of the Koran.

This version of the Koran was distributed by an organization called Al-Haramain ("Riyadh-based charity suspected of funding al Qaeda") to an estimated 8,000 to 10,000 U.S. prisoners.

Conclusion: Author states unequivocally that jihad is about fighting infidels and forcing them to submit to Muslims and pay the tax levied on all kuffar swine. Date of authorship unknown but you can be sure that this official was of an extrememly high rank and that his views are 100% approved by the two-faced Saudi government that smiles at infidel Americans but actively recruits America's violent, low-life, criminal underclass and encourages it to convert to Islam and actively fight infidels till they willingly submit to Islam forever.

Do you suppose that this official Saudi policy was conceived and implemented as a favor to us?

While we're thinking of questions to ask ourselves, Where, dear Reader, do you personally intend to draw the line and decide that these people are died-in-the-wool enemies of yours who intend to kill you if necessary to get you to submit or cease resistance to Islamic overlords for you, your spouse, your children, and your community? Or does it still strike you as hypothetical and remote? Preaching murder and the extinguishment of your culture to violent prisoners in the penitentiary near you as no big deal, perhaps? Official Saudi policy, no less.

From: Wahhabi Prison Fellowship: The teaching of jihad in American penitentiaries, Internet Haganah, 9/18/05.

Sorry.

Sensitive person.


Note artistic fingers, starter beard.

Desires to instruct resident and deployed Neo-Ordovician dimbulbs fixated on killing and maiming national enemies. Eeeyuuh!

Love for foreigners intense, not extending, however, to doing anything about fascist Krazy Kat governance of said foreigners. Actually not extending to doing anything other than writing cool sign with "We love you" on it.

Bush/Blair/rednecks cause of world's misery.

Bush/Blair cause of rednecks.

He's sooo sorry.

September 18, 2005

Muslim hostility to Christians.

In Lebanon, Christians represented 50-60% of the population prior to 1975; today this percentage has declined to 25-30%. Most importantly, their political influence has severely weakened. The Lebanese emigration ministry estimates the number of emigrants at five million, more than three and a half million of which are Lebanese Christians. In the past Lebanon was known to be a safe haven for persecuted individuals who were hunted because of their religious or intellectual beliefs. Today, however, it is driving out its own children because of the Arab infringement, the Palestinian foolishness and the Syrian occupation.
"The Ordeal of Arab Christians." By Magdi Khalil , The American Thinker, 9/18/05 <-- Dhimmi Watch, 9/18/05.

It's much worse than as portrayed here. See The Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam. by Bat Ye’or

Petunias.

That sweet ring of steel coming out of the scabbard.

Mr. al-Kafir found a story about a proposal by an Indian leader, Mr. Praveen Togadia, that Hindus and Christians enter into a "civilisation treaty" between to defeat "jihadi terrorism."

Well, it's not quite bare steel in the breeze just yet but it's one more important voice speaking out about what is, of late, as obvious as 20 grams of cocaine dumped in your IV bag.

Christianity, Hinduism, and virtually all other existent religions have proved to be compatible with the the modern age's superior virtues of freedom and plurality. Islam is steadfastly antagonistic to such progress. Therefore, those of us who can respect others whose beliefs diverge from our own are already unified against those who cannot. We should all start acting accordingly.[1]
A large number of Americans and Europeans don't get it just yet. 9/11 went down the memory hole for all intents and purposes, just as did all the other outrages committed by Muslim fanatics.

The latter haven't quit and they have ambitious plans. Good people need to hunt them down like the mad dogs they are.

Notes
[1] "Indian Politico Urges Hindu-Christian Alliance Against Jihad." Patrick al-Kafir, Clarity & Resolve, 9/17/05.

September 15, 2005

Poet Laureate of New Jersey.

In 2003, Everett Leroy Jones, a/k/a LeRoi Jones, a/k/a Amiri Baraka (“Blessed Prince”) goes to Yale:

His invitation to speak at Yale – to say nothing of the rousing ovation he received there for reading a poem accusing the Israeli government of having had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks – unfortunately reflects the depraved condition of academia today.

When we examine the manner in which Baraka has expressed his thoughts and observations over the past forty years – his racist diatribes, his incomprehensible rantings, his virtual noncompliance with rules of grammar and punctuation [or ignorance therof], his strings of obscenities woven together into works whose elegance scarcely equals that of the average restroom wall scrawling – it is difficult to do anything but marvel at the fact that someone so unskilled has been able to achieve both fame and acclaim as a poet and college professor.
"Racist Yale Laureate." By John Perazzo, FrontPageMagazine.com, 8/24/03 9 (emphasis added).

Prof. Jones-Jones-Baraka was appointed Poet Laureate of New Jersey in July 2002. (No, we're not writing this piece for The Onion or to compete with Scrappleface and Iowahawk.)

Here are a few quotes from this radical black nationalist (and Malcolm X wannabe) that were available to the selection committee to help them to select the right person for the great honor to be bestowed by the state:
  • “Most American white men are trained to be fags." [The Colonel was trained to find, fix, and destroy the enemies of the United States at one time. What a bitch to be over the hill during times like these.]
  • “Smile, jew. Dance, jew. Tell me you love me, jew. I got something for you now though. . . . I got the extermination blues, jewboys. I got the hitler syndrome figured.”
  • “Atheist Jews double crossers stole our [black people’s] secrets. . . . They give us to worship a dead Jew and not ourselves . . . . Selling fried potatoes and people, the little arty bastards talking arithmetic they sucked from the arab’s head.”
  • “Poems are bullshit unless they are teeth or trees or lemons piled on a step." [Ohhh! If only we had said that.]
  • All the stores will open if you say the magic words. The magic words are: Up against the wall mother fucker this is a stick up! . . . Let’s get together and kill him [the white man] my man.” [Isn't "motherfucker" one word?]
  • “Rape the white girls. Rape their fathers. Cut the mothers’ throats.”
  • “We [blacks] must eliminate the white man before we can draw a free breath on this planet.”
Not much that can be added to Mr. Perazzo's fine bit of research. No use for him and me to get slimed by looking at all that this person has said.

Do RTWT, however, to see what institutions of higher learning paid good money to have this jumped up asst. restroom attendant "teach" and what honors were bestowed on him.

We simply publish a few quotes of our own by way of commentary:
. . . [F]or he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people [liberals, America haters]. He shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province [New Haven]; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey [boodle], and spoil, and riches . . . .

-- Daniel 11:23-24 (emphasis added).

And:

And I will give children to be their princes, And babes shall rule over them. And . . . the child shall behave himself proudly against the ancient, and the base against the honourable.

-- Isaiah 3:4-5 (emphasis added).

Beach -- Cambodia.

Koh Rong, "Snowdrift Bay" - Sihanoukville. Cambodia.

September 14, 2005

Blindness to the horror.

Dr. Sanity has an interesting post about a young woman who came home early from school to make a painful discovery about her mother and suddenly went blind:
Barbara, I submit to you, is a perfect metaphor for the Democratic Party of the 21st Century. Like Barbara, they have had a rude psychological shock, stumbled, and become [hysterically] blind to the serious events happening in the world around them. They feel they have been deceived and lied to --betrayed even--and have chosen to direct their rage against President Bush, the symbol of all the evil in the world. By doing so, they don't have to focus on the real evil --the horrific attacks of 9/11. They appear to be sublimely indifferent to the reality around them and choose to focus on events and incidents that are trivial in comparison. Like Barbara, their world is falling apart, but all they can do is close their eyes to it and focus ("displace") their anger onto a convenient target whose election was a blow to their narcissism.[1]
We just posted about Jane Fonda's unerring ability to find the people and themes that are so beloved by the enemies of her own culture and country. Thirty-five years within which to examine her beliefs from the days of Vietnam, not to mention study the history of what happened in Vietnam and Cambodia, and the result is . . . the La Brea tar pits of unchanging worldviews.

Neither the reality of utter swine like Comrade Duch nearby, the former boss of Tuol Sleng prison[2] in Cambodia nor the pitiless, daily murders of the Khmer Rouge -- mere drops in the oceans of left-wing conceit, slaughter, torture, and expropriation -- give her or the Left pause to consider
Beast.

that political sanity and basic decency can be found in polities that are much less than pure. Churchill (that's Pete Churchill down at the feed store) said something like, "Living in a democracy is like being on a raft in the ocean. Your feet are wet a lot but you stay afloat." Zealots crave never-yet-attained perfection, however, and are aptly described in the Yiddish proverb, "Send a fool to close a window and he'll close all the windows in town." Take care of one of the deserving folks on that "little list" who "won't be missed," a la Gilbert and Sullivan, and pretty soon the whole $%#^@ country is permanently AWOL. How cool is THAT?!

Pol Pot, while in Paris in the early 1950s, with other Cambodian students, organized the group that was the forerunner of the Khmer Rouge. In a pamphlet he pledged someday "to institute a democracy 'pure as a diamond.'" Later, Pot and the other leaders of the Khmer Rouge wanted to establish "real socialism" in Cambodia.[3]

How did that actually play out? How did the moral giants and seers manage in the implementation in their revolution of compassion? Well, other than the impoverishment of the entire nation and wholesale murder and torture, not bad!

Here's an account of first hand exposure to down and dirty revolution.

From the Publisher's Weekly review of Voices from S-21: Terror and History in Pol Pot's Secret Prison by David Chandler there is this about how some journalists discovered the prison after the Vietnamese invasion:
Drawn to the site [Tuol Sleng] by the smell of decomposing flesh, the men discovered the bodies of 50 recently murdered prisoners, an array of implements of torture and a vast abandoned archive of institutionally sanctioned torture and murder.[4]
The Colonel, try though he might, simply cannot find in his dearest left wing friends the least impulse to anchor their political views in such stark realities.

Pol Pot set out on a mission to find democracy "pure as a diamond." (We'll give him the benefit of the doubt and say that was some sort of a ball park, Cleveland, Ohio concept of "democracy" he entertained before his embrace of Communism.) Afterwards, he and his cohorts nevertheless strived to find "real" socialism, the genunine article, the real deal version.

In the process, the only pure thing they created was a pure hell.

Local manifestation:

Through most of that regime, Cham Navy, 35, lived with her grandmother after her parents were taken away and killed. She was forbidden from visiting the pond behind her grandmother’s house.

One day she sneaked out to the pond and found it full of bodies.[5]
Jane Fonda wants the war in Iraq ended so that the money being spent their can be spent on New Orleans: total blindness to any salutary effect of killing Sunni thugs in Iraq.

Not beast.
Total fixation on a domestic failure, any domestic failure, with no sense of evil other than an exaggerated sense of evil in Bush and the Republicans and the lackeys of Halliburton.

The search for political and social perfection is an expensive and wasteful one. Human affairs simply will never be that perfect. But even with its imperfections, the U.S. is a country that anyone who spends more than a week away from it should be most grateful to return to.

That gratitude will never be found on the left, however. Barbara in Dr. Sanity's post may one day come to appreciate that even flaws in a loved one do not mean that that person is beneath contempt or lacking in love for her.

She will come to that realization directly, if she hasn't already. The Left will forever be trying not to gag when the National Anthem is played.

Notes
[1] "A Classic Case of Hysteria." Dr. Sanity, 2/3/05 (emphasis added).
[2] "The Poisonous Hill that is TUOL SLENG." By Youk Chhang.
[3] "Left-Wing Monster: Pol Pot." By John Perazzo, FrontPageMagazine.com, 8/8/05.
[4] Amazon.com.
[5] "KR Trial Project Unearths Haunting Memories. "By Lee Berthiaume and Kuch Naren, The Cambodia Daily, 8/12/05.

September 13, 2005

Guidance system intact.

"Stilll crazee after allll these years . . . ."


The Colonel still wouldn't kick Jane out of bed for eating crackers, sardine sandwiches, pizza, prime rib, burgers, carrots, melba toast, Beanie Weenies, Hostess HoHos, popsicles, chop suey, Mongolian beef, marshmallows, salmon bisque, lox and bagels, ribs, Mississippi Slim Rocket Exhaust chili, pate, jelly doughnuts, paella, couscous, fried chicken, armadillo on the half shell, or cashew kitten.

That said, the Colonel has just got to take note of Ms. Fonda's unerring, majestic, diurnal, Swiss-made, twice-a-day tidal consistency. What does she do but she chooses to go on a tour of the U.S. to do some anti-Bush grandstanding and chooses a certified dimwit as a her co-campaigner and co-gadfly. This is no other than Member of Parliament, George Galloway, described by our source as "a passionate supporter of anti-Western causes in the Arab world."

The Air Force should study her brain for clues on how to build a guidance system for its rockets that WILL NEVER LOSE SIGHT OF THE PLACE WHERE THEY ARE DESTINED BY GOD TO BLOW THEMSELVES UP.

You'd think that Ms. Fonda would factor into her political planning the lessons of past experience. A normal person would conclude that going to the country whose troops were then and there in the field against American troops (bad enough) plus sitting down in the gunner's chair of an AA gun emplaced to shoot down your own countrymen probably wouldn't do a lot for you in the court of public opinion. U.S. public opinion, anyway. Non-traitorous left wing U.S. public opinion, anyway.

Nope, like %$^#& gravity, she voluntarily seeks out a bozo who hates the West. You just have to admire the fact that a seemingly intelligent woman can be such a one-note ukelele for, what is it now . . . , 35 straight years and counting. You have to.

The Colonel always appreciated the observation during Cold War times that where the socialists, commies, and fellow travelers in the West were concerned, no promise of socialism would ever be remembered and no failing of capitalism would ever be forgotten.

I dunno. I guess the West really is rotten, depraved, and heartless. If only we would listen to The People Who Live In Other Countries™ we could learn so much.

"Fonda will join Galloway's anti-Bush tour." By Paul Martin, The Washington Times, 9/5/05.

September 12, 2005

A must read.

"September 11 Remembered…in the Wake of the Egyptian Elections," Freedom for Egyptians, 9/11/05.

This thoughtful woman, Freedom for Egyptians, has written an exceptional post on the reservoir of good will in Egypt for things American and liberal values, as well as on the failing of U.S. policy.

It is refreshing to read intelligent commentary from the minds of people of good will in other countries and to perceive that they understand very well the benefits to humans that came from the political advances in the West.

The Wall Street Journal pointed out several years back that the desire for democracy in the hearts of the people in Tian An Men Square was entirely Chinese in its origin. No one from the West led the demonstrators to that place. Freedom for Egyptians herself reveals that she, an Egyptian, has an excellent grasp of the mechanics of democracy, the importance of press freedom, and the universal problem of thugs wanting to hold onto power at the expense of the majority of the people.

She writes "now we are threatened to fall victims for a merciless ideology that does not share any values of the accumulated legacy of humanity."

We all have a stake in that legacy and the greater tragedy is that this woman shows more appreciation of and understanding of that legacy than many in the West. The Colonel attests to his belief that few of his own countrymen have the slightest understanding of the original constitutional scheme of the United States, let alone an understanding of how THAT incredible legacy in this particular country was debased by political opportunists and citizens caring only to receive some portion of the monies flowing from the public coffers.

She further writes:
I find that many Muslims fail to question Islam’s shortcomings unlike Christianity and Judaism which were subjected to reasonable questioning. It is true that extremism does exit in every creed but not to the extent of blowing the self up in a children’s school bus while believing of going to paradise.
The contrast between the common sense views of this woman and the hysteria of the Mad Mujahadin threatened by loss of their privileged status takes one's breath away, inured as we are to year after year of jejune diatribes from the fanatics.

It is sad that, in the Colonel's view, this voice coming out of Egypt is such a rarity. It might be that the voices would be a great chorus if people could speak without fear of retribution in Egypt. (See, esp., "URGENT:An APPEAL from an Egyptian Journalist to the Free World- PLEASE HELP " in her "RSF on Mubarak's fifth term." 9/12/05.)

Edge of the universe -- now you know.

"Most distant cosmic blast sighted." BBC News, 9/12/05.

Scientists report that they have observed light from the probable collapse of a massive star that came from 13 billion light years away . . . .

Considering that in one light minute light travels 11,160,000 miles, how does one grasp the immensity of the distance that is 13,000,000,000 light years?

One light year represents a distance of 60 x 24 x 365 (525,600) x 11,160,000 miles, or roughly 5,865,696,000,000 miles. Now multiply that by 13,000,000,000!!!

The only way the human mind can possibly grasp the immense distances involved and the blinding speed of light is to watch how fast Christmas decorations go up in Wal Mart again after December 26 each year.

One Wal Mart in Ponca City, Oklahoma, put up its Christmas decorations again one year on Memorial Day.

NOW do you grasp how far away that collapsing star was?

Cheetah action.

"In Iran, Camera Traps Reveal Rare Asiatic Cheetahs." Science Daily, 9/12/05.

September 11, 2005

Again with the teenage finger wagging already.

First Runner-up, 2004 California Dorque Search Semifinals.
Free cool turban and essential identity mask to all recruits for Islamic Army of Allah. While they LAST, surfer dudes!

This just in from Junior:
We are Muslims. We love peace, but peace on our terms, peace as laid down by Islam, not the so-called peace of occupiers and dictators.
The Colonel is beginning to detect certain themes in Gooneybird Muslim public perororations presaging punishing crusades operations:

  • An ability of any Muslim to take a leak on someone else's homeland converts that territory into "Muslim" territory in perpetuity. Compare Brezhnev Doctrine.
  • The concept of "occupier" as applied to Muslims is a nonstarter. Once Muslims take over someone else's lands Muslims become THE OWNERS. End of story. Only infidels are "occupiers."
  • Muslims are majorly in favor of peace, especially if it can be preceded by lengthy periods of war.
  • Muslims have not got a clue about the concept of "the other guy" as an entity above the level of "oxygen thief." Peace "on our terms" or "as laid down by Islam." You get the picture. Un . . . believable.[1]
  • All Muslim political or military operations of the utmost nobility require the wearing of a veil.
  • The confused mental state of a convert to Islam is directly proportional to his willingness to wear a funny hat and a veil (with matching purse).

The Colonel wonders if this kind of life choice could have been avoided by a bigggg hug from mommy and telling the beloved child, "We love you and think that it's so cute that frustration over your inability to get laid has manifested itself in a desire to betray your culture, your nation, and your family, and to wear funny clothes."

Just a littttttle more love and all this could have been avoided.

"Tape Released: American al Qaeda Member Warns of Attacks." By Brian Ross, ABC News, 9/11/05 <-- Clarity & Resolve.

Notes
[1] What Junior is saying illustrates the core Muslim concept of the infidel as filth, "najis," q.v., with attendant opening of the psychological door in the Muslim mind to the primacy of "ME" and "US" over infidels, women, and slaves. With these three subhuman groups, Robert Spencer has written, Islam has not satisfactorily come to grips. To be a Muslim male, historically, was to be lord over all three.

The Colonel would be pissed too if, all of a sudden, he had to standing in line behind any of these lesser mortals as a result of "the West" or "liberalism" or "democracy." It's bad enough that every once in a while the Colonel has to stand in line behind a person with a French last name.

Unified theory.

Eject! Eject! Eject! had a great post two years back on what separates the nation and the world into warring camps.

Hint: personal views on shooting Karl Rove vs. whipping Karl Rove:

Those on the other side see individual responsibility as the final arbiter of human behavior. The United States of America is, without question, the most individual-centric nation
Russian liberal.
Two-legged monster beloved by 'Progressives,' leftists, liberals, socialists, commies, and fellow travelers in all democratic societies.
in the history of the world. We have enshrined in the structure of our culture impressive guarantees of individual freedoms, and because of that, we see an enormous spectrum of behaviors –- some noble, others... shall we say, ‘colorful,’ and some completely vile and disgraceful –- that are the natural outcome of allowing people a great deal of personal freedom. Such a society will produce a US Constitution, a Bill of Rights, a Voyager probe… and unlimited episodes of COPS and The Jerry Springer Show.

We all profess to be in favor of more freedom. Freedom is the Platinum Visa card. We all want one. Responsibility is the credit rating. Not so much enthusiasm for the kind of discipline needed to earn one of those.
Responsibility. Eject! Eject! Eject!, 8/20/03 (emphasis added).

New storm.

Political cartoon.

Reminds us of the famous "Five Stages of a Government Project":
  1. Enthusiasm.
  2. Despair.
  3. Search for scapegoats.
  4. Punishment of the innocent.
  5. Rewards for the guilty.

September 9, 2005

Hell holes as perspective.

The unreality of American leftist politics is pathetic. For the entire period of the Soviet Union it was largely a "kicking and screaming" proposition to get the left to recognize that there was like, something er . . . disturbing about communist regimes. Vast networks of concentration camps, arbitrary arrest, judicial murder, famine, assassination, that sort of thing.

And we haven't even mentioned the really bad stuff.

Ho hum.

The source shows the pitiless nature of N. Korea. We really all need to keep these kinds of Latrine Nations™ in mind when we unsheathe the knives to take on instances of American depravity such as genetically modified food or muted Middle American disdain for the ecstatic celebration of homosexuality. (If Walt Disney were still producing the old cartoons, one shudders to imagine who would be Bugs Bunny's new "pal.")

Young men ought to be lined up to take their turn as troops of the line in the defense of something that is unique and precious. Instead, our politicians are endlessly embroiled in major political battles with people who are delirious with joy that they can foul their own nest in any small way.

America has been spared the awful losses that other nations have suffered throughout history. However, this wonderful exemption we've enjoyed seems to have bred a fatal inability to understand pure evil and to summon the will to crush it when revealed.

Today, therefore, there is no gnat bite that is not litigated or minor personal failing that isn't magnified into near conclusive proof of one's servitude to the Evil One. What luxury!

It's possibly a pricey luxury, however, and the price ultimately to be paid for fecklessness may be beyond all imagining.

Update 9/9/05:

The Museum of Left-Wing Lunacy helpfully provides this quote of Chrissie Hynde of The Pretenders:

"Let's get rid of all the economic (expletive) this country represents! Bring it on, I hope the Muslims win!"
You have heard of The Pretenders, haven't you?

Ms. Hynde need not stand in line behind any other to advance her claim to Advanced Spiritual Sear™ status. After all, there are the indisputable facts that she (1) supports PETA and ending animal cruelty and (2) has lost two fellow band members to drug overdoses in one year! Talk about a claim to moral authority! Why do we not turn to our 26-year-olds more often for guidance?

Whether, however, she understands that she stands on the shoulders of giants, and benefits, handsomely, it is presumed, from the "economic (expletive)" that so distresses her is not as clear as her spiritual perfection.

Ditto for her understanding of what a victory for Muslim obscurantism would mean for her fellow citizens, let alone herself. Or are reports of Pakistani and Iranian female punk rocker bands being suppressed by Karl Rove too? Is there no limit to how low this man will stoop?!

The Colonel is the first to sneer at backwardness anywhere. However, when even the gooneybird Muslims can correctly point out a certain vileness of our own, one must, alas, concede the point.

It's a vileness that is rooted in the rejection of the moral underpinning of capitalism not in capitalism itself. This is an idea instantaneously rejected by the minds of the Left just as an actual chord would be rejcted by Ms. Hynde's guitar.

N. Korean contribution to civilization.

N. Korea produces very high quality counterfeit U.S. currency . . . .

Anti-Americanism in S. Korea.

Check out the first b/w photo then you can appreciate the rest of the article.

No all S. Koreans hang it this way but it's amazing there are more than, say, two or three, I'm thinking.

September 8, 2005

The Fate of Africa -- not good.

From: Soapgun, 8/23/05.

Soapgun reports some his thoughts in reading The Fate of Africa, by Martin Meredith.

Africa is definitely what you would call "diverse" in the addled argot of the eek and shriek™ battalions. Enthusiastic Arab slavers and raiders of north and central Africa, Bushmen hunters, Masai cattleherders, and Zulu impi individually had more in common with people who go to trekkie conventions than each other. Shaka used to have his warriors trample thorns into the parade ground with their bare feet with what you might call "enthusiasm encouragers" circulating through the ranks to bash the brains out of those who were not getting with the program.

Now that, sports fans, is some serious diiiiii-VERS-ity.

Finger pointing for Africa's problems cycled through colonialism, then Marxist Lennonism, then kleptokolonelism. Maybe honest observers will say Africa's problem is that it has simply reverted to savagery (Darfur, Rwanda, Zimbabwe) and anarchy (South Africa?).

This is a job for the U.N.!

We've already seen that China doesn't give a fig about the well being of Africans so long as their strategic interests are protected.

If South Africa slides further into anarchy, and becomes a playground for the African National Congress to parcel out the wealth created during the years of white ascendancy, it could be a grim century for Africa - Islamic male panic at dilution of domestic hegemony, revival of slavery (U.N. to Darfur: "Take two aspirin."), AIDS, agricultural madness, aid dependency, superstition, magic, betrayal by elites, and Chinese maneuvering for who knows what.

A clear-eyed inside view of Egypt's dictatorship.

Every Egyptian apparently knew the results of the elections beforehand; I would say that 90% of the registered votes did not go to the polls [on 9/7/05]. Any Egyptian citizen can write long list for the violations committed since the so-called election process has started, that is summarized in one phrase; “my vote won’t make a difference”. The amendment of the article 76 of the constitution by the president after the May 25 Referendum to allow multiple presidential candidacy, uncovered the real intention and the nature of the dictatorship of Egypt.

* * * *

May 25, the famous Referendum Day comes, and instead of listening to the people, the thugs of the Egyptian ministry of the interior beat and rape women in the streets of Cairo, ripping their clothes into shreds. This is the language our regime prefers to talk to us with. The incident of beating civilians with brutality occurred more than once since May 25 and until Election Day and only because Egyptians dared to freely express their opinion.

* * * *

The Egyptian people had attempts to write their first constitution in 1880 and 1907.

It is worth mentioning here the illiteracy rate in Egypt at that time was over 90% which did not hamper them to think with dignity and love for our beloved Egypt. The 1919 Egyptian Revolution was the only revolution worldwide that produced a true liberal experience among revolutions in the 20th century. All peer revolutions were either socialist, communist…etc. The Egyptian constitution was written before the constitution of the country of the largest democracy in the 21st century that's India.

For the dream of freedom, I will continue to be vocal and outspoken about my rights and others. If the election game came to an end, then the battle has just started. Free-willed Egyptians will definitely win because they have a cause. Humans are not created to be slaves for power-thirst lunatics. We are born free.

I love you, my Egypt.

Is this the Promised Democracy? Freedom for Egyptians.

The promise of democracy in Egypt is taken seriously. You have to appreciate the author's sophisticated appreciation of the ways in which elections are manipulated.

The problems of the Muslim world are not limited to the influence of Islamic obscurantism. Simple thuggery plays a part.

Late is good.

From: Micheal Yon <--- One Free Korea.

September 5, 2005

Denial and leftist idealism: formula for extinction.

No kidding.

William Whittle quotes some highly distilled truth from Lt. Colonel Dave Grossman, which amounts to this:
  • Normal citizens are sheep. They have no capacity for violence.
  • Wolves love violence and are indifferent to the suffering of others.
  • Sheepdogs can be violent but love their fellow citizens. They are warriors.
  • Sheep live in denial and "do not want to believe that there is evil in the world."
  • The only response of the sheep to violence or the threat of violence is denial. Dealing with actual violence is just too hard.
The Bulletproof Mind. By Lt. Colonel Dave Grossman <-- "Tribes." Eject, Eject, Eject, 9/5/05.

Then Mr. Whittle lays out the mechanism of leftist denial:
  • Sheep who think that [wolves] can be reasoned with are living in denial.
  • They take it further by attempting to gain control over violence by thinking they are responsible for it.
  • Ergo, to make violence go away, all that is necessary to do is to cease being a bad person yourself [which any white, rich, Western, healthy, secure person is].
  • When this inner transformation takes place, other people will cease to hate us and not be mean and violent.

This idea of inner transformation and repentance, he says, is especially attractive to the Left [who are already wrapped up in their own intelligence, academic credentials, and powers of prophecy]. Their stance is one of complete moral cowardice. Wolves are indifferent to the dreams of pussies and will push and until stopped by those willing to "head out into the forest with a shotgun and blow [their] fucking head[s] off."

Courage isn't free. It is taught, taught by certain tribes who have been around enough and seen enough incoming storms to know what one looks like. And I think the people of this nation . . . desire and deserve some fundamental lessons in courage.

Because we are going to need it.

"Tribes." Eject, Eject, Eject, 9/5/05 (emphasis added).

This is an exceptional read and all commands and attached clerks and jerks shall engage in immediate personal jihad to read it through NLT 1700 hrs local time.

Cultural suicide in the Republic of Laputa.

An excellent post by Ilana Mercer demonstrating the tragic and undebated commitment to Third World cultural dilution of the United States:

The exclusive emphasis of late on border security in the immigration debate has helped open-border advocates immensely. Everyone (and his dog) currently concurs that we have no problem with legal immigration, only with the illegal variety. It's now mandatory to pair an objection to the invasion of the American Southwest with an embrace of all forms of legal immigration.

. . . “[I]n 1965, with no real debate or voter participation, the U.S. Congress replaced the national-origin immigration criterion . . . , which effectively resulted in an emphasis on mass importation of people from the Third World. The new influx was no longer expected to acculturate to liberal democratic Judeo-Christian traditions. . . . .”

. . . Americans will never assert their right to determine the nature of the country they live in and, by extension, the kind of immigrants they welcome. The security risk newcomers pose is the only legitimate conversation. . . .
"Immigration Occlusion." By Ilana Mercer, 5/9/05 (emphasis added).

Crybaby Pollard.

Jonathan Pollard, convicted Israeli spy is trying something else to get out of jail.

Fine by us. He's traitorous scum in the Colonel's book, but, hey, hand him over to Israel if it comes clean and turns over all its records on its deliberate and knowing attack on the U.S.S. Liberty in international waters.

All the records.

Did those %$#&s think we would forget!

"Pollard to Supreme Court: Grant Me Prisoner of Zion Status." By Hillel Fendel, Arutz Sheva, 9/5/05.

Practical Sharia - X: summary execution blessed by religious authority.

Update on practical implementation of sharia.

Mufti, Sheikh Akrama Tzabari is the Mufti of Jerusalem. He issues a fatwa that authorizes the Neignboring Entity[1] to execute 15 Arabs accused of working with Israel.

Here are some of the problems with this:

  1. Mr. Tzabari lives in Israel but he purported to speak to a legal matter within the jurisdiction of the Neighboring Entity. Ergo, Islamic legal rulings are not constrained by international boundaries. Whose fatwa would control if an Egyptian mufti also decided to weigh in on the execution of the accused?
  2. Everyone in the Neighboring Entity seems to think this guy is qualified to make decisions that permit the summary dispatch of the accused. Apparently attending the Muslim equivalent of Yale Divinity School or Whitewater Bible College is enough to issue death warrants. (Pat Robertson call Strike Headquarters.)
  3. "Summary" is the operative word, as there apparently has been no involvement of an independent judiciary in the process of determining guilt. Execution is apparently just an afterthought.
  4. The mufti made a life-or-death decision based on no discernible direct involvement in the cases of the accused, but authorized death . . . death, mind you . . . on the mere fact of the Neighboring Entity's decision to arrest the 15. "Executive action" to die for.
  5. Legal representation for the accused is apparently not an option for the accused.
  6. The Neighboring Entity is 100% clueless about the rule of law and is wedded to the sharia that was state of the art law in the seventh century and possibly, just possibly, a slight improvement over then-extant truly primitive tribal law.[2]
Lest the above strike you as merely academic concerns consider the following instances of extrajudicial murder:

Israel Police Atty. Rachel Edelsberg informed Hadari that Israeli government sources had turned to the PA on this matter, and that the PA promised not to use the religious ruling issued by the Mufti. The ruling still stands, however. The 15 are still alive, but executions are invariably carried out very suddenly - and informally - in the PA.

In 2004, several such executions were carried out, among them: On July 2, 2004, Fatah terrorists murdered, execution-style, Muhammad Rafiq Abdel Razek, a resident of the Jenin area, before a cheering crowd. Around the same time, a PA policeman threw a hand grenade into the jail cell of an accused Israeli agent in Gaza, injuring seven suspected Israeli agents. In February of 2004, PA taxi driver Tahseen Abu Arkub, 50, was killed, and a month earlier, the same fate met a 27-year-old resident of Shechem (Nablus).[3]
Note the direct involvement -- inside the jail -- of a Neighboring Entity policeman.

Note too the cheering crowd at the Fatah murder of a man by Fatah terrorists. As the Germans loved Hitler in the 30s, the Arabs love their lawless terrorist.

Again we say the burden of proof has shifted inexorably to Muslims to prove that they have an understanding of civil liberties and human rights and that lose Kanonen in their midst are disgraced and neutralized.

Notes
[1] Henceforth, this is the Colonels appellation for the so-called "Palestinian" Authority. The Muslims often cannot bring theyselves to refer to Israel as such and so choose the formulation "Zionist Entity." The Colonel applauds all workable political euphemisms and circumlocutions and only wishes there were many more than there are. George Carlin would be proud.
[2] "Mufti Not Charged With Incitement to Murder." By Hillel Fendel, Arutz Sheva, 9/4/05.
[3] Lest you think us harsh and focused only on the deficiencies of the sharia, check out the inanities of Anglo Saxon law.

Also sprach der Islamische Kirchführer.

John Gibson makes these points about Sheik Abd-al-Rahman al-Sudays, "the imam of the Mosque of Mecca — Islam's holiest shrine:"

  • Sheikh al-Sudays is as close to being the supreme Muslim religious authority as is possible.
  • He spoke on Saudi TV.
  • Saudi TV is broadcast to hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world.
  • He stated Hindus openly hate Muslims in Kashmir and "[threaten] an imminent danger and a fierce war in the whole Indian subcontinent."
  • Stated Jews are "pigs and monkeys."
  • Stated "advocates of credit" [Federal Reserve, FMCC, Mastercard, Jews?] and "worshippers of the cross" have "rotten ideas and [a] posonous culture."
"Saudi Arabia: Time to Draw a Line in the Sand." By John Gibson, Fox News, 6/4/05.

As we've said already, we agree that the remedy for Slime Speech™ is even more Slime Speech™.

And, Lordy me, if this "Sheikh" isn't a gift to the West, then we'll eat an unopened can of humus.

Right there you have just a dandy example of the intellectual prowess of Muslim leaders. If you don't have the intellectual, economic, societal, and, esp., military juice to do jack*#$% about what ails you, well, then you plunge headlong down into playground invective:

  • "Your mother's an idol worshipper." (Ouch.)
  • "Your ideas are rotten."
  • "You're a big old monkey."
  • "Supply side economics are a species of fraud.
(The Colonel has, by way of full discloure, known many a Jewish fox but has not ever made the acquaintance of any Jew pigs or monkeys. It is a sheltered life we have led.)

Great moments in scurrilous politics - III: Robertson-Chavez.

John Gibson at Fox News has nifty point about the call for Hugo Chavez's assassination by Emmisary-of-Satan Pat Robertson.

The leftists in the Democrat Party and media couldn't get enough of that, could they? Mr. Gibson correctly points out that there isn't a sane person who wouldn't cheerfully have 1,900 live American soldiers back in exchange for one dead S. Hussein. Clearly a variant on the emminently moral conclusion that it would have been a Good Thing to have assassinated Hitler in 1932.

He also takes Mr. Robertson to task on the issue of the appropriateness of a relgious leader's advocating political action other than apple pie get-out-the-vote campaigns. That's the real issue and it's more than fair to delve into the ramifications of that. (The Colonel's view is that church leaders in the U.S. are not constitutionally mandated to limit their policy recommendations to the curse of people talking in church or UPS truck drivers' double parking in front of Starbucks.)

So George Stephanopoulos (search) in 1997 — just after he left the Clinton White House as a close Clinton advisor — wrote in a Newsweek article that Clinton was going to have to think about assassinating Saddam Hussein.

Where was the outrage?

* * * *

But the rest of the high dudgeon, the wailing and beating the chest was simply because Robertson represented a way to try to embarrass Bush, even though the president had nothing to do with Robertson or what he said.
"A No Brainer." By John Gibson, Fox News, 8/26/o5.

The impending Saudi crisis.

The Saudi regime has accrued at least $60bn from record-high oil prices, and so has the financial means to win the hearts and minds of Saudi citizens on its own, without relying on the imposition of hardcore Wahhabi rule. But the regime views any such measures as a threat to its survival. Rather than initiating democratic change, the royal family has endorsed huge public projects that emphasise the importance and superiority of the monarchy and its exorbitant surplus.
"After Fahd." By John R. Bradley, Prospect, 9/05.

A dream of the emmigration of the heart.

My father had a dream: To live in a country where he could escape the hell of poverty, where you do not measure a person's dignity by where or as who you are born. Most people believe in roots, in differences, in categories. By my father's grave I could find no roots. He was one of many parents who throughout their lives had fought to give their children a more dignified life than he himself had been offered. There we stood, before his grave [in Norway where he had asked to be buried] and watched as nationality, religion, ethnicity and roots were buried, in a country that he was neither born in nor felt at home in. And yet it became a powerful symbol to us, his descendants. By my father's grave I saw no roots. I saw only a dream, a dream of the emmigration of the heart, and the immigration of freedom. I saw a dream of freedom, and the price he paid for it. The migration of the heart is the dream of freedom. That is my message to you today.
Norwegian-Pakistani comedienne Shabana Rehman, opening speech at the 2004 Bergen International Festival, 5/31/04.

From: Fjordman <--- Bjorn Staerk.

RTWT. Or you will be martyred.

September 4, 2005

Bon mot.

We were reminded of a news item from a couple of years ago concerning a female suicide bomber named Reem Al-Riyashi, a Palestinian who killed several Israelis at a border crossing as penance for her adultery.

The woman’s husband was a Hamas operative who came home one day to find her “putting the 'ho’ in housewife” as it were, with another operative from the same terrorist group.
Extreme wit from The Religion of Peace: "Explosive Hamas Love Story."

NOAA sattelite imagery of Katrina aftermath.

The support that "moderate" Muslims give to terror.

In its short post, TROP points out that each of terrorists involved in the slaughter of the innocents at the school in Beslan, N. Ossetia, was willing to participate because they "would be rewarded with Paradise according to their RELIGION!"

It then absolutely strips bare the stock response to terrorist incidents of the Muslim apologists that the acts of terrorists are not supported by rank and file Muslims who practice a ROP:

Then consider the reaction of the broader Muslim community to Beslan. There were some tepid condemnations, to be sure, mixed in with the apathy, but not the sort of outrage that was seen when French schools banned headscarves or when there were false rumors about a Guantanamo guard dropping a Qur’an![1]
This one passage lays it out. It's all b*t about moderates v. jihadis. When the World Trade Center towers were struck the Muslim community world wide was ecstatic and danced in the streets. When "routine" brutalities are perpetrated, well, what's to get excited about? It's just our boys at it again.

So help me God, the time has passed so long ago that Westerners needed to tread slightly lest they unfairly step on Muslim sensibilities. Today, now, for the foreseeable future, ALL Muslims bear the burden of proof on first making their case why a particular outrage was not routine Muslim doctrine in operation.

That's especially true any place in the non-Muslim, non-Arab, non-Persian world. How it is that Muslims got there in any numbers is frankly beyond the Colonel's powers of imagination. While they're there -- for now -- they need to ratchet up the apologetics and go the extra mile, then the extra mile again, to prove how it is that Muslims can live in harmony with kuffar in the latter's own country and be willing to accept that the sharia is and always will be an absolute nullity in their new homes.

The possibility of forced repatriation of The Indigestibles must soon be discussed in some European countries in light of the incontrovertible evidence[2][3][4] that some Muslims have in some cases become indigestible, unassimilable lumps in societies that generously and kindly held out a welcoming hand to them.

Notes
[1]
This Week in Islam. Weekly Column, The Religion of Peace, 9/05/05 (emphasis added).
[2] "Will Muslim Immigration Trigger Wars in Europe?" By Fjordman, 8/31/05.
[3] "Swedish Cultural Symbols Targeted by Attackers." By Fjordman, 9/2/05.
[4] "Swedish Muslims Call For Terror Attacks Against Sweden." By Fjordman, 9/28/05.

China: prosperous . . . arming . . . still commies.

"What I think is disconcerting is the willingness of China to not only help but to defend rogue regimes," said Princeton Lyman, who served as ambassador to both Nigeria and South Africa in the Reagan, Georgse H.W. Bush and Clinton administrations.

"China has in effect inhibited the U.N. from imposing sanctions on Sudan, and in Zimbabwe is helping to bail out a regime that is repressive and is destroying the country," Lyman said.[1]

Anyone who maintains that China is a benign presence in the world bears a heavy responsibility to posterity to be dead right. The above tells us a lot about China's vision of the good and the beautiful and its indifference to basic decency (intentions, morals). The one below tells us about capability to realize its malevolent dreams (means).

China . . . is building up its military for the long-term goal of projecting its power well beyond Taiwan . . . .[2]
These points bear thinking about.

For that matter, why are we falling over ourselves to trade with and build up China? Shirley, there are other countries that have lesser determination to be a strategic competitor of the U.S. Like:

  • Thailand
  • Malaysia
  • Philippines
  • Australia
  • Costa Rica
  • Mexico
  • Chile
  • Brazil?
That said, wouldn't it be to our advantage to foster a much friendlier relationship with Russia? Don't we have interests that are more similar than not? We ought to be ecstatic about Pres. Putin's determination to sit on the Chechnyans and the Central Asian nations, as Russian resolve will ensure that Wahhabism does not spread north and east out of the Middle East. Development of Russian oil and protection of its oil pipelines will strengthen Russia and weaken the Saudis and Iranians.

Similarly, it is in the interest of the U.S. that China be prevented from discovering, as it did with Tibet, that suddenly Eastern Russia was actually Chinese all along. Remember how the Chinese suddenly remembered all that uranium of theirs that was under Tibet? (In contrast to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, the Chinese really did want to take over Tibet raw materials and steal them from the Tibets out-bloody-right. Now reread the second quotation above.)

The idea that American business had shipped American scrap iron to Japan prior to Pearl Harbor was seen as madness after the fact. In what important respects is our present approach unnaturally favoring China different from that pre-war policy?

Well?

Are we seeing here the same kind of amoral pursuit of profit over national interest that made the old saw about capitalists selling the communists the rope with which to hang them so precisely accurate?

Whatever "them" it is who effectively rule the United States -- and "neocon" isn't even close to being a useful term to identify them -- they doubtless have factored in very little of the long- or short-term national interest in building up China, just as they have ignored the interests of the American people in utterly failing to stop illegal immigration.

Didn't Wal Mart at one point hold itself out as peddling American-made products? Now it's a marketing arm of the Central Committe in Beijing. Anything to worry about here? Shouldn't the policy rule be, "Adopt the most efficient method of getting goods and services to Americans that is consistent with national survival"?

Only fools invite strangers to take up permanent residence in their living rooms and only fools and traitors enrich and empower obvious enemies. But this truth doesn't phase any of the resident geniuses encamped along the Potomac.

While the Colonel would rather watch cartoons than think about foreign policy and his views can sometimes lack a certain sophistication, the truth remains that a quorum of regulars down at Hooters could probably come up with a foreign policy that in its broad outlines (wow is that a good pun, or what?) rivals the excellent product emanating in polysyllabic, mellifluous and refined tones from Foggy Bottom.

Sometimes drunks at AA meetings will recount a tale of such ghastly personal destruction as to render the audience fairly helpless with laughter. And at the end of the tale, the speaker will always state, "And my best thinking got me there."

Your government's plans to protect you. Case study #856,056,821.
We are paying a lot of highly educated people who would never be caught dead at Hooters or a Super8 Motel (two staples of the Colonel's existence) to devise really, really sophisticated policies that advance the national interests of the people of the United States. Perhaps the photo nearby will serve as a modest reminder that fancy titles, degrees, and big paychecks don't necessarily amount to @#$%.

Notes
[1]
"China, Africa Dictators Link Rings Alarms." By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, Fox News, 8/15/05 (emphasis added).
"[2] Pentagon: China Military Building Beyond Taiwan." By Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, Fox News, 7/20/05 (emphasis added).

Fascist Amerika.

"Velocity profiling" employed against Negro colored black mixed-race famous Civil Rights agitator fraud interloper Bhoddisatva spiritual leader Al Sharpton.

Post-arrest muck raking investigation reveals nationwide officially-sanctioned network of (primarily white) police officers in league with local and state courts to keep poor people driving rented Lincolns from rising above poverty, oppression, and accidents of birth.

From: ever-alert ScrappleFace, 8/29/05.

Islam's Tiny Minority.

The true minority in Islam are those who categorically reject intolerance and jihad. This is because hatred of and war against the infidel are core Islamic principles. Case in point: the Ahmadiyya Muslim Movement. Since their group's inception in nineteenth century India under their spiritual leader, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, they have denounced the so-called lesser jihad of violent armed expansionist warfare against the kuffar. They have also since been roundly condemned as apostates by the mainstream Islamic community because of this.

These people are the true visionaries of Islam, and they are largely ignored here in the West.
Clarity & Resolve, 9/3/05 (emphasis added; link omitted).

RTWT.